home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: erlang.gbar.dtu.dk!c948374
- From: c948374@erlang.gbar.dtu.dk (Rask Ingemann Lambertsen)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.networking
- Subject: Re: Amiga Web Browsers
- Date: 17 Apr 1996 16:46:36 GMT
- Organization: News Server at UNI-C, Danish Computing Centre for Research and Education.
- Message-ID: <4l379c$2u6@news.uni-c.dk>
- References: <aTmosh.1cxn@amiga.ow.nl> <1572.6675T774T2870@Redrobe.demon.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: erlang.gbar.dtu.dk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
-
- On 11 Apr 96 12:54:57 +0000 Mike Redrobe (Mike@Redrobe.demon.co.uk) wrote:
-
- > Hi, Thomas Tavoly , on 10-Apr-96 21:03:09 you scribbled....
- > >In article <4kfhj5$q1t@aggedor.rmit.EDU.AU> s9507594@minyos.its.rmit.EDU.AU
- > >(Morden) writes:
-
- > Nope - its not any particluar datatype...its the OS remapping that freezes the
- > cpu like that...
-
- > > Alternatively you can use Executive
- > >to manage priorities.
-
- The most useful part of Executive are the programmes Top and Aload IMHO.
-
- > >> MUI-based web browsers are just as fast net-access-wise (except for
- > >> IBrowse, and I can't figure out why) as AWeb.
-
- It is because IBrowse has two animations going while transferring and/or
- decoding images. If only there was a way of turning them of (both of them),
- IBrowse would probably be faster.
-
- > ...and what has the gui go to do with speed of network access? different part
- > of the code...
-
- MUI seems to use CPU time even for programmes that are idle. Only a few
- percent (mostly), but it still uses a little bit of CPU time for
- something.
-
- --
- Regards,
-
- /»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»\
- | Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | E-mail: c948374@student.dtu.dk |
- | Amiga GNU CC README maintainer | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/ |
- | Keyboard error: <Ctrl> and <Alt> are stuck - press <Del> to continue |
-